President Trump's recent words on the FBI-DOJ-CIA scandal over his campaign and presidency.
"Maybe some day I will get involved in it".."Let's see what happens" - Public outcry PRESSURE the DOJ - Law and Order - "that's a crime"
So with AG Jeff Sessions recused from all Russia related matters, and Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein testifying to the Senate that he conducted no oversight of the Mueller probe, then who was running the DOJ from May 2017 to Feb 2019?
As you can see, when the the phrase FBI or DOJ is used, sometimes it is referring to the Special Counsel team. Why? Because they confiscated all DOJ/FBI activity related to all things Russia.
If it was Special Counsel Mueller and his lawyers... what all did they do? and why?
May 2017 interview of Primary Sub Source shows Crossfire Hurricane Team was informed, there was no corroboration, for supporting evidence, of Carter Page FISA
DOJ tells FISC court in 2018 that the Primary Sub Source's testimony was "truthful" but doesnt include he informed them there was "zero" corroboration.
Wood's File created to make Christopher Steele appear as the only Source relied on? (to hide Steele's source saying "zero" corroboration of facts?)
The shocking outcome of this, is that the source told the FBI that it informed the "Crossfire Hurricane' Team, in January 2017, that his information was useless (not corroborated and hearsay).
Is it possible Weissmann created the Wood's file to misdirect the public from the Primary Sub Source saying it was all fake? And instead training the FBI and DOJ to hide behind the "truthfulness" of Steele saying he believed what he believed (blocking his source saying it was BS)?
Is it possible the Steele Dossier and Mueller appoint was to cover the illegal spying stopped by Admiral Rogers at the NSA? (see the last article of this homepage for full details).
This was a fraud on the 4th Amendment and instead surveilled an American citizen and citizens due to the 2 hop rule.
AG Barr can go down as a great AG in history, or...
Video and Supporting Evidence from the largest research compilation on the internet of this topic.
Did the SSCI Frame our President of Treason, by making a joint statement of no evidence of wiretapping, one day before they reviewed the wiretap of the President (via the 2-Hop authority of a FISA wiretap, of a Trump Campaign member Carter Page)?
Did the Republicans on the SSCI leave town to appear not associated with the WireTap (FISA) viewing on 03/17/17 by the SSCI Vice Chair, Senator Warner?
Key dates/events to remember:
Full details --------------------> Go Straight to Find Out More ---------------------------------->
To see Details of the DOJ activity during this time period (Leak Investigation; Wood File re-creation) see the DOJ Activity Re-Review Page.
To see Details of the Leak Investigation - See the 3/17/17 Page.
Treason for talking with Russians?
Or only if you accuse the President of doing it?
Or is it all just politics, and the uniparty just exposed themselves?
Full Background details are provide in the link below - "Find out More"
Senator Rubio says the intel community told the FBI not to include the dossier (Steele Dossier)
"Coherent and well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election" ????????
The Report shown above was voted 14-1 to release it.
I pray you were the NO Vote Senator.
.FISC 2017 Review - 85% non-compliance in querying data including citizens.
Court reports the searches were unauthorized.
No foreign intelligence value.
The FISC court was created to ensure our 4th Amendment Rights were protected.
FBI ignores FISC court.
On April 16 2016 the NSA Director, Admiral Rogers, stops all unauthorized contractor access to the NSA database in response to Compliance Inspection Review Report 93.
The results of Compliance Report 93 were addressed in a report under the FISA Court Judge Ms. Collyer deemed the Collyer Report.
This report outlined 85% noncompliance with rules for accessing American citizens private data, and identified that private contractors were given access to this database, without the knowledge of the FISA court.
What transpired next is suspect to the greatest abuse our 4th Amendment Right in history.
The FBI has unjustifiably ignored the court's reporting requirement, or even comply partially with the FISC court order December 2019. (Reminder who ran the DOJ during this time?)
A court order to address 85% non-compliance with the query system ( a system for monitoring foreigners, on foreign land, updated to now include US systems that foreigner use.. ISPs etc)
Has the FBI gone rogue? Why are they even involved with terrorism investigations? Can our military and CIA handle foreign terrorism?
What is the point of having a FISC court if they FBI can just ignore them? What is the point of having a FISA law if it doesn't need to be followed?
Target A surveilled - talked to Person B - Person B talks to multiple people.
All citizen's digital life data scooped up but the Agencies promise to keep us masked (Pink Swear)
Specificity of person and items to search at a location?
Surveillance capability of associates and the associate's contact?
Initially a Wiretap, evolves to US systems, to include US person;s ENTIRE Digital Life.
But the Agencies keep US Citizen's masked" (Pinky Promise)
Or will you surrender it?
These people did not surrender it.
This is about you, not us.