Why do Legal FISAs Matter - 2 Hop Rule?

How is a Title I FISA warrant different than a Title III warrant issued by a local judge on a domestic person? 

• Title I FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) - Federal

• Title III warrant (Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968) - Local

Do we care? 

• Does a Title I FISA warrant look at 1 person (target) like a Title III warrant does? Hmm, good question, I never thought about that.

• Does a Title I FISA surveil anyone the target talks to (One Hop)? Again, good question I never thought about that.

• Does it surveil any contacts of the person the target may have talked to (Two Hop)? Again, this is new to me.

Is this implying that American citizens through something called a 2-Hop Rule can have their entire digital life collected and set in the trust of an NSA/FBI/CIA analyst to keep it private (or masked as they like to call it)?

• Does anyone know who Edward Snowden is? What about Bradley Manning? 

If we are to give the Government this enormous spying power, don’t we want them to treat it with respect and only use it to stop acts of terrorism in our country.

I ask again, do we care? What is the 4th Amendment Right? Does it matter anymore?

• 4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

I ask again, is there a difference between a Title 1 Warrant (Agent of Foreign Power) and a Title III warrant (Local warrant to investigate a single person of criminal conduct)?

• The answer is confusing, because the knowledge of it will make you concerned about your 4th Amendment Rights.

For example, what is the legality of a getting a Title 1 FISA on a domestic person? Let’s choose Carter Page as an illustration since this is a recent event.

• A Title I FISA is not a legally usable tool for domestic terrorism, as its surveillance authority are only legal for monitoring activities of foreign powers and agents of foreign powers.

• Title I FISA ACT Authorization: Through “We The People”, Congress authorized counter terrorism agents the use of FISA authority to stop acts of terrorism in our country.

Does FISA authorize the surveillance of US citizens not deemed as agent of foreign powers?

• The Answer is No.

How did Carter Page get a Title I FISA warrant issued on him?

• Carter Page (Naval Academy Graduate) was an FBI and CIA asset that assisted these Agencies in thwarting terrorism.
• 
  

Answer: The FBI forged documents to submit Carter Page to the FISC court as a “Agent of a Foreign Power” - FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith (Mueller Team)

So if Carter Page was fraudulently labeled, as an Agent of a Foreign Power, to obtain a FISA, did it only effect him and his privacy? 

• Do we need to learn more about the substantial authority “We The People” via Congress authorized this Title I warrant to have on surveillance?

Again, re-review the discussion above about the 2-Hop rule, and ask yourself:

• Was your data and privacy illegally collected? 

• Has anyone been held accountable?

• Is this entire system no longer sustainable due to how easily and readily it is abused

• Should "We The People" no longer authorize its use.

An Option for AG Barr - Who can go down as a great man, or.....

• Arrest the abusers...

• Forfeit the system...

• Or tell us “We the People” that we are ruled by you, and we no longer have a Republic.

2 of the FISA warrants obtained on Carter Page were already rulesd they LACKED CAUSE (invalid) - Don't believe me?  - Read here